Pro-Israel News

Date:
Friday, January 9, 2015
Netanyahu and Barkat send condolences; foreign minister urges
tougher stance on northern branch of the Islamic Movement
 
BY TIMES OF ISRAEL STAFF January 8, 2015, 2:26 pm | The Times of Israel| 
 
Foreign Minister Avigdor Liberman issued a scathing broadside against a radical Islamic
preacher in Israel in the wake of the deadly terror attack on the offices of the Charlie
Hebdo satirical magazine in Paris.
 
“If there is an important lesson that we learn from the terror attack,” Liberman said in a statement
Thursday, “it is that extremist groups, which are distinguishable from terror organizations only by
semantics and legal minutiae, must be dealt with preemptively. Those who tolerate such
movements and organizations in the end pay for this [tolerance] with the blood of many innocents
and with a threat to the very democracy that allowed them to function. Therefore, we must not
dally any longer or allow the continued activities of the northern branch of the Islamic Movement
headed by Sheikh Raed Salah.”
 
Salah, a firebrand Muslim preacher, anti­Zionist and former mayor of the Israeli Arab city of Umm
al­Fahm, served a two­year prison term after a conviction for funneling funds to Hamas. The
Islamic Movement’s northern branch, led by Salah, has long claimed that Israel was secretly
working to destroy the Muslim shrines on Jerusalem’s Temple Mount.
 
“This movement is an inseparable link in the chain that includes the terror organizations of Hamas,
Islamic Jihad, al­Qaeda and Islamic State, and over the years its members, led time and again by
Sheikh Salah, have demonstrated that they support terror and identify with it,” Liberman
maintained on Thursday.
“The northern branch of the Islamic Movement under Salah espouses the exact same values
as the perpetrators of the massacre in Paris, and the same intolerance to any criticism or speech
that does not fit their extremist values. They constitute a threat to Israeli democracy and to the
lives of Israel’s citizens.”
 
Liberman vowed to “continue to work to push them outside the bounds of the law, and will do so
with clear and unambiguous legislation that won’t be cancellable through legal sophistry.”
Israeli leaders sent messages of condolence and support following the killing spree by two
suspected Islamist brothers in the offices of Charlie Hebdo.
Jerusalem Mayor Nir Barkat called his Parisian counterpart, Anne Hidalgo, on Thursday morning
and said, “The residents of Jerusalem understand and share in your pain.”
He added, “We must make sure that terror does not pay. The terrorists must be brought to justice
and everyone must understand that the savage attack in Paris was not an isolated event but part
of an international campaign of terror.”
 
As in terror­stricken Jerusalem, the key to overcoming terror is resilience on the part of Paris’s
residents, Barkat said.
“The support of the mayor of Jerusalem and the people of Jerusalem is very important to us,”
Hidalgo responded, according to a statement from the Jerusalem municipality. “I will share this
important message of support with the members of Paris’ City Council and with all of the residents
of Paris.”
 
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu roundly condemned the attack after meeting Thursday
morning in Jerusalem with Norwegian Foreign Minister Borge Brende.
“Yesterday’s murderous attack on free expression clearly demonstrates the disdain of radical
Islam for the values we hold dear,” the prime minister said.
“We cherish freedom and tolerance; they worship tyranny and terror. And through this terror they
seek to impose a new dark age on humanity. We express profound sympathies to the government
of France, the people of France. We extend our condolences to the families of the victims and our
wishes for a speedy recovery to the injured,” Netanyahu said.
 
The shooters, he added, “are part of a global movement and this necessitates a global response. I
believe that with the strength of our resolve and the unity of our action, we can defeat this threat to
our common civilization. And what the battle against terror requires is courage, clarity and
consistency. Israel is being attacked by the very same forces that attack Europe. Israel stands
with Europe. Europe must stand with Israel.”
The Foreign Ministry in Jerusalem decided to immediately send back to Paris the Israeli
ambassador to France, Yossi Gal, who spent the last few days in Israel attending a conference of
Israeli envoys to Europe.
 
“Upon his return, Ambassador Gal [will meet] with the leaders of the French government, with the
leaders of the Jewish community and will express Israel’s condolences [over] the despicable
attack in Paris,” ministry spokesperson Emmanuel Nahshon said in a statement.
The Paris attack also set off a ruckus between Hatnua leader Tzipi Livni and Jewish Home
chairman Naftali Bennett.
In comments Wednesday in response to the Paris attack, Livni called it “an attack on all the
nations of the free world, including Israel. You don’t talk with or appease terror. You fight an
uncompromising total war against it – here, in France or anywhere else in the world.”
Speaking at a gathering of students at the College of Management in Rishon Lezion, she insisted
that Israel faced diplomatic isolation because the Netanyahu­led government failed to advance
peace with the Palestinians.
 
“It’s not enough to speak confidently about security. You have to know how to rally the world to
support the defense interests of Israel – this Netanyahu does not know how to do…. The fact that
the Palestinians are taking unilateral steps at the United Nations and are taking the IDF to the
[International Criminal] Court in the Hague flows from their understanding that Netanyahu is weak
in the world, that he can be defeated there,” said Livni.
 
Her comments were condemned by Bennett, who was next to address the gathering.
“Today there was a horrible attack in France in which a group of Muslims armed with rifles carried
out a killing spree in Paris because of a cartoon that purportedly insulted Islam…. Livni stood here
earlier and spoke about occupation, diplomatic isolation. So I ask: Why don’t you get on a plane to
Paris to [help them] solve their problems? Maybe you’ll manage the negotiations, offer them a
diplomatic horizon, because that’s the solution.”
 
Bennett compared Israel’s struggle with Hamas and Hezbollah to the wave of attacks by Islamist
terrorists in France.
“What do they want? A piece of land?” he asked of Hezbollah. “No. They don’t want us here. We
have to wake up and understand this.”
 
Date:
Thursday, January 8, 2015
Washington weighing possible sanctions if PA follows through with
international tribunal bid
 
BY STUART WINER January 8, 2015, 1:39 pm 
Updated: January 8, 2015, 2:05 pm | The Times of Israel|
 
 
The spokesperson for the US State Department said Wednesday that the Obama
administration does not consider the Palestinians eligible to join the International Criminal
Court, as Palestine is not a sovereign state.
In a press briefing, Jen Psaki clarified the Washington’s position on Palestinian moves for
membership in the ICC.
“The United States does not believe that the state of Palestine qualifies as a sovereign state and
does not recognize it as such and does not believe that it is eligible to accede to the Rome
Statute,” Psaki said. She noted that there are “legal aspects” to the issue that needed to be looked
at.
 
The Palestinian Authority began filing paperwork at the United Nations to join the ICC last month,
and UN Secretary General Ban Ki­moon accepted the request earlier on Wednesday.
UN approval could now allow the ICC to open cases as of April 1 on serious crimes the
Palestinians allege were committed in the West Bank, East Jerusalem and the Gaza Strip.
But Psaki emphasized that even according to the UN itself, Ban’s stamp of approval was
bureaucratic and not an indication as to whether or not the Palestinians have the right to join the
court.
“The UN spokesperson issued a statement you may have seen earlier today making clear that the
steps taken in fulfilling the secretary­general’s role as depository for the ICC Rome Statute are
purely administrative,” Paski said. “So they are therefore not a judgment on eligibility; they’re
accepting the documents.”
 
Paski said that a bill proposed by Republican Sen. Rand Paul that would freeze aid to the
Palestinians if they continue to pursue ICC membership was also being weighed.
“I’m not going to speak to proposed legislation,” she said. “There’s no question that we will be
complying with all laws as it relates to our assistance, of course. So we’re consulting with
Congress; we’re looking at the law. I don’t have any other analysis at this point in time about what
the impact will be.”
While Palestinian membership in the court doesn’t automatically incur US punishment, existing law
says any Palestinian case against Israel at the court would trigger an immediate cutoff of US
financial support. Paul’s bill would ban assistance until Palestine stops its move to become a
member of the court.
 
Should Paul’s bill go through, US Secretary of State John Kerry could still apply a waiver to
continue aid to the Palestinians, an option Psaki said the State Department was reviewing.
“Our lawyers are still looking at what the implications are,” she said. “I think it’s unlikely we’ll have
analysis on it right now. It’s something we’re looking closely at and we’re consulting with
Congress on.”
No matter what, Palestinian membership at the ICC was unlikely to go through without a response
in the form of a change in US policy on aid.
“There could be implications,” Psaki conceded but remained tight­lipped on what those measures
would entail.
 
Other Palestinian applications to join various UN bodies did not, she said, contribute to the peace
efforts.
“You know our view on their desire to not only become a state, which we certainly support, but
their interest or efforts to accede to UN organizations, which we feel, of course, is
counterproductive to the stated goal of achieving peace in the region.”
The ICC bid followed the Palestinians’ failure to win a UN Security Council majority for a resolution
imposing a three­year time limit for a full Israeli withdrawal to the pre­1967 lines in the West Bank
and Jerusalem.
 
Psaki said that despite the recent developments that have been driving a wedge between Israel
and the Palestinians, Kerry is still interested in resuscitating peace talks between the two sides.
The last round of talks fell apart in April 2014.
“I think the secretary will never give up on the prospect of looking for an opportunity for the parties
to make the necessary decisions to return to negotiations and ultimately come to an agreement on
a two­state solution,” she said. “Obviously, that needs to be up to the parties. There’s no
questions there’s tensions between them at this point in time, to put it mildly. But he remains
engaged with the Israelis and we remain closely engaged with the Palestinians as well, and I
expect that will continue through the course of the coming months.”
 
Psaki also noted that the US was aware of Israeli reports that Hamas leader Khaled Mashaal had
been booted out of Qatar, but said they were not yet confirmed.
“I’m not going to speculate on it,” she said. “I don’t have any confirmation about it. Our view on
Hamas is very clear.”
 
Date:
Wednesday, January 7, 2015

 

 

Black-hooded gunmen shot dead at least 12 people at the Paris offices of the satirical newspaper Charlie Hebdo, a publication firebombed in the past after publishing cartoons lampooning Muslim leaders and the Prophet Mohammad, police said.

The attackers were reported to have said, "We have avenged the Prophet," as they entered the building shooting.

President Francois Hollande headed to the scene of the attack and the government said it was raising France's security level to the highest notch.

"This is a terrorist attack, there is no doubt about it," Hollande told reporters.

Another 10 people were injured in the incident and police union official Rocco Contento described the scene inside the offices as "carnage."

"About a half an hour ago two black-hooded men entered the building with Kalashnikovs (rifles)," witness Benoit Bringer told the TV station. "A few minutes later we heard lots of shots," he said, adding that the men were then seen fleeing the building.

France is already on high alert after calls last year from Islamist militants to attack its citizens and interests in reprisal for French military strikes on Islamist strongholds in the Middle East and Africa.

British Prime Minister David Cameron described the attack as sickening.

Late last year, a man shouting "Allahu Akbar" ("God is greatest") injured 13 by ramming a vehicle into a crowd in the eastern city of Dijon. Prime Minister Manuel Valls said at the time France had "never before faced such a high threat linked to terrorism."

A firebomb attack gutted the headquarters of Charlie Hebdo, a publication that has always courted controversy with satirical attacks on political and religious leaders, in November 2011 after it put an image of the Prophet Mohammad on its cover.

The last tweet on Charlie Hebdo's account mocked Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, the leader of the Islamic State, which has taken control of large swathes of Iraq and Syria.

Date:
Tuesday, January 6, 2015
NGO seeks to prosecute three PA heads, pushes for their arrests,
following Abbas’s move to join International Criminal Court
 
BY AVI LEWIS January 5, 2015, 5:09 pm| The Times of Isreal| 
 
Israeli legal group Shurat HaDin, the Israel Law Center, filed lawsuits on Monday at the
International Criminal Court (ICC) against three Palestinian Authority leaders for alleged war
crimes, terrorism and human rights offenses, following PA President Mahmoud Abbas’s
move last week to join the court and seek to prosecute Israel.
Indictments were brought against PA Prime Minister Rami Hamdallah, Abbas’s deputy; minister
Jibril Rajoub; and PA intelligence chief Majed Faraj, all of whom belong to Abbas’s Fatah party.
The NGO is also pursuing existing litigation filed against Abbas last November, as well as a case
against Gaza­based terror group Hamas and its leader Khaled Mashaal, filed at the ICC on
September 2014.
 
According to Shurat HaDin, during the 2014 Israel­Gaza conflict “Fatah openly boasted in
Facebook pages and other media channels that it launched projectiles that caused the injury and
death of Israeli civilians — a war crime under international law.”
The NGO pressed The Hague to issue international arrest warrants for the three pending litigation.
Shurat HaDin’s chairwoman and founder, attorney Nitsana Darshan­Leitner, said that the
organization will make it as difficult as possible for Palestinian leaders at the ICC, and that they
must be held accountable for crimes committed under their supervision.
 
“Abbas and his friends in terror organizations believe that the courts can be used as a weapon
against Israel, while at the same time, the Palestinian leadership carries out crimes with utter
impunity against their own people and against Israeli civilians,” Darshan­Leitner said.
The case brought against Faraj and Hamdallah details widespread torture and killings of
Palestinian residents who reside in areas under PA control, according to a statement released by
the group.
 
“Faraj and Hamdallah, as commanders in the Palestinian security services, are directly
responsible for widespread human rights violations committed [in the West Bank] against regular
Palestinians by units under their authority,” the statement read.
According to the indictment, Rajoub, too, was fully aware of the violations it listed and should be
held “accountable for the actions committed under his auspices by his subordinates in the
organization,” the statement read.
The ICC can prosecute individuals accused of genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes
committed since July 1, 2002, when the court’s founding treaty, the Rome Statute, came into
force.
 
“The PA and Hamas have to understand that the International Criminal Court is a double­edged
sword,” Darshan­Leitner said. “Years of murder, acts of terrorism and incitement will now be
brought before prosecutors for investigation.”
On Saturday Israel froze NIS 500 million ($127 million) in Palestinian tax revenues collected on
Ramallah’s behalf, in response to the ICC membership request.
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Palestinians leaders were the ones who should be
prosecuted in the ICC over their unification with rival faction Hamas.
 
“It is the Palestinian Authority leaders – who have allied with the war criminals of Hamas – who
must be called to account,” he said. “IDF soldiers will continue to protect the State of Israel with
determination and strength, and just as they are protecting us we will protect them, with the same
determination and strength.”
 
On Thursday, Abbas asked the International Criminal Court to investigate Israel for war crimes
allegedly committed during the 50­day war with Hamas and other Gaza terror groups last summer.
Israel lost 66 soldiers and seven civilians in the month­long conflict, while the Palestinian death toll
surpassed 2,100, according to Hamas officials in Gaza. Israel said half of the Gaza dead were
gunmen and blamed Hamas for civilian deaths because it operated from residential areas, placing
Gazans in harm’s way.
 
 
Date:
Tuesday, December 30, 2014

A video being widely circulated in Palestinian social media networks teaches jihadists how to stab a Jewish person in a manner that ensures their speedy death.

The video is reportedly being circulated by a group calling themselves the “resisters of occupation in the occupied West Bank and Jerusalem,” according to a Jewish Press report.

The video shows two men, a “teacher” and a “victim”, dressed in a Keffiyeh headscarf–garb which was popularized by the first Palestinian leader, Yasser Arafat. The teacher then demonstrates how to casually walk up to someone and stab them in an efficient and deadly manner.

The demonstration emphasizes that in order to inflict maximum damage, the knife should be twisted after stabbing the Jewish person.

The video comes as 2014 has seen an exponential increase in Arab stabbing attacks against Israeli Jews.

In November, two Palestinian terrorists stabbed to death four Rabbis who were praying peacefully in their Jerusalem synagogue. The Palestinians, who were armed with axes, left an additional eight wounded in the jihadi onslaught. Hamas, the terror group which controls the Gaza Strip, supported the jihadist’s actions. A Hamas spokesman threatened at the time, “There will be more revolution in Jerusalem, and more uprising.”

Palestinian media entities have created other platforms to call for aggression against Jews.

In October, a video game was released called “The Liberation of Palestine,” which encouraged gamers to “liberate Palestine” through any means necessary. The game preferred users to choose armed resistance over diplomacy. A developer of the game said regarding the controversial tactic: “The language of weapons is the most effective with the Israelis.”

Date:
Tuesday, December 23, 2014
Jerusalem and DC have signed but not ratified pact, with US citing
possible constraints on arms sales to IDF
 
 
BY AFP December 23, 2014, 1:33 pm | The Times of Israel| 
 
UNITED NATIONS — A treaty laying down international rules for the $85 billion dollar
global arms trade goes into force on Wednesday with campaigners vowing to make
sure it is strictly implemented.
The United States — by far the world’s largest arms producer and exporter — has signed the
treaty, but has yet to ratify it.
Israel joined the pact last week, but has not yet ratified it.
Lawmakers in the US balked at cottoning to the treaty, arguing that it could impair Washington’s
ability to sell arms to Israel, among other reasons.
 
Fifty senators, including all 45 Senate Republicans, listed a number of reasons for their opposition
to the treaty in a letter to US Secretary of State John Kerry in October.
“The State Department has acknowledged that the treaty includes language that could hinder the
United States from fulfilling its strategic, legal and moral commitments to provide arms to key allies
such as the Republic of China (Taiwan) and the State of Israel,” they wrote.
Other key exporters such as France, Britain and Germany have ratified the charter and pledged to
adhere to its strict criteria aimed at cutting off weapons supplies to human rights violators
worldwide.
A total of 130 countries have signed the treaty and 60 have ratified it.
“For too long, arms and ammunition have been traded with few questions asked about whose lives
they will destroy,” said Anna Macdonald, director of the Control Arms coalition of nongovernmental
organizations.
 
“The new Arms Trade Treaty which enters into force this week will bring that to an end.”
“It is now finally against international law to put weapons into the hands of human rights abusers
and dictators,” she said.
Campaigners, however, say much work lies ahead to implement the treaty, with a first meeting of
the states parties to the treaty to be held around September next year.
Decisions will have to be made about the financing mechanisms for the pact and setting up a
secretariat to oversee its implementation.
Amnesty International noted that five of the top 10 arms exporters — France, Germany, Italy,
Spain and Britain – have ratified the ATT. China and Russia have yet to sign on.
The first major arms accord since the 1996 Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty, the ATT
covers international transfers of everything from tanks to combat aircraft to missiles, as well as
small arms.
 
The treaty compels countries to set up national controls on arms exports. States must assess
whether a weapon could be used to circumvent an international embargo, be used for genocide
and war crimes or be used by terrorists and organized crime.
“If robustly implemented, this treaty has the potential to save many lives and offer much needed
protection to vulnerable civilians around the world,” said Macdonald.
 
Date:
Monday, December 22, 2014
President says that despite Netanyahu’s criticism, Jerusalem aware that
Tehran has frozen progress for duration of talks
 
BY TIMES OF ISRAEL STAFF December 22, 2014, 6:07 pm
 
Despite Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s criticism of Washington’s handling of
negotiations with Iran, Israeli intelligence acknowledges that Tehran has made no
advancements during the past year and a half of talks, US President Barack Obama
said Sunday.
 
Netanyahu has frequently voiced his criticism of what he sees as overly accommodating
agreements being negotiated between world powers and Iran, both before last year’s interim
accords were announced and afterwards. The Israeli prime minister has repeatedly taken to the
world stage to warn about the threat posed by a potentially nuclear armed Iran.
Speaking in an interview with CNN’s Candy Crowley, the president defended his diplomacyfocused
foreign policy, saying that “where we can solve problems diplomatically, we should do
so.” Obama said the American­led effort to reach a negotiated solution to defusing Iran’s nuclear
program was an example of a successful diplomatic campaign.
 
“You look at an example like Iran, over the last year and a half, since we began negotiations with
them, that’s probably the first year and a half in which Iran has not advanced its nuclear program
in the last decade,” Obama told the news outlet.
 
The American leader said Iran’s halted progress was “not just verified by the United Nations and
the… IAEA and ourselves,” but that “even critics of our policy like the Netanyahu government in
Israel, their intelligence folks have acknowledged that, in fact, Iran has not made progress.”
Obama’s remarks were supported by a confidential IAEA report leaked last week which said Iran
is honoring the interim nuclear agreement reached last year with the P5+1 world powers.
The document, obtained by Reuters on Friday, showed that Tehran was not enriching uranium
above a five­percent concentration, and that it has not made “any further advances” at two
enrichment facilities and a heavy water reactor which was under construction.
 
Iran and world powers failed to reach a deal by the November deadline and agreed to extend
nuclear talks until July 1, 2015. A final agreement aims to ensure Tehran won’t be able to develop
nuclear weapons under the guise of its civilian activities, and would lift international sanctions that
have crippled Iran’s economy.
Iran denies that it is seeking a nuclear weapon and insists its nuclear activities are for solely
peaceful purposes. But UN inspectors, European, American and Israeli leaders have said Iran
has concealed large parts of its nuclear program, and believe it is intended to develop a nuclear
bomb.
 
Date:
Friday, December 19, 2014

By TOVAH LAZAROFFKHALED ABU TOAMEHHERB KEINONMAYA SHWAYDER 

12/18/2014 21:06 | The Jerusalem Post| 

The United States would not support a new Palestinian-proposed UN Security Council draft resolution, US State Department spokeswoman Jen Psaki said on Thursday.

"It is not something we would support," Psaki told reporters. 

Jordan formally submitted to the United Nations Security Council on Wednesday a draft resolution calling for peace between Israel and the Palestinians within one year and an Israeli withdrawal from the West Bank by the end of 2017.

The Palestinian-drafted resolution was formally submitted to the 15-member council, which means it could be put to a vote as soon as 24 hours later, but it does not guarantee it will happen. Some drafts formally submitted have never been voted.

Diplomats say negotiations on the text could take days or weeks. Jordan's UN envoy Dina Kawar said she hoped the council could reach a unanimous decision on the resolution.

Date:
Thursday, December 18, 2014

12/17/2014 16:10 | The Jerusalem Post| 

 

Israel reacted furiously Wednesday to the European Court of Justice’s decision to take Hamas off the EU’s list of terrorist organization, rejecting EU explanations that this was just a “technical” step that will be overturned before it is implemented.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, before a meeting with Joni Ernst, the newly elected Republican senator from Iowa,  said this was one example of “staggering”  European “hypocrisy.”

Hamas, he said, “has committed countless war crimes and countless terror acts. It seems that too many in Europe, on whose soil six million Jews were slaughtered, have learned nothing. But we in Israel, we've learned. We'll continue to defend our people and our state against the forces of terror and tyranny and hypocrisy."

Foreign Minister Avigdor Liberman, who recently criticized Netanyahu for not taking a diplomatic initiative to rebuff anti-Israel moves internationally,  said that to take Hamas off the list for “technical reasons” at a time when terror was on the rise throughout the world, and not only in the Middle East, was a “wrong decision” that sends exactly the wrong message.    

Shortly after the angry reactions coming from Jerusalem, the EU's External Action Service (EEAS), essentially the EU’s foreign service,  said the  EU court's decision earlier in the day was a legal, not a political decision, that will likely be appealed.

The court  annulled  the bloc's decision on 2003 to keep Hamas on a list of terrorist organizations, but temporarily maintained the measures for a period of three months or until an appeal was registered.  The courts said that the evidence provided to place the organization on the list did not meet EU standards, and was based on media and Internet reports.

According to the statement, by the EEAS, which is headed by EU Foreign Policy chief Frederica Mogherini,  “This legal ruling is clearly based on procedural grounds and it does not imply any assessment by the Court of the substantive reasons for the designation of Hamas as a terrorist organization.”

According to the statement, this is “a legal ruling of a court, not a political decision taken by the EU governments. The EU continues to uphold the Quartet principles,” the statement read.

The Quartet principles ban engagement with Hamas until it forswears terrorism, recognizes Israel, and accepts previous Israeli-Palestinian agreements.

The statement said that the EU institutions were carefully studying the ruling and “will decide on the options open to them. They will, in due course, take appropriate remedial action, including any eventual appeal to the ruling. In case of an appeal the restrictive measures remain in place.”

The statement was released soon after Jerusalem responded angrily to the decision, and after Netanyahu said Israel was “not satisfied” with the explanations of the EU that Hamas's removal is only a technical matter.

Two central EU countries have already been working on a dossier providing the court with the evidence that will satisfy it.

“The burden of proof is on the EU and we expect them to immediately return Hamas to the list where everyone realizes they should be,” Netanyahu said. “Hamas is a murderous terrorist organization whose charter says that its aim is to destroy Israel. We will continue to fight it with determination and strength so that it will never realize its aims. "

The British Foreign Office issued a statement saying that the UK will work to ensure that Hamas remains on the EU’s terrorist list.

According to the statement, the court’s judgement “is procedural and does not mean the EU and UK have changed their position on Hamas. The effects of the EU Hamas listing, including asset freezes, remain in place. We are studying the detail of the judgment carefully, and will work with partners to ensure that the Hamas listing at the EU is maintained. Hamas’ military wing has been proscribed in the UK since 2001 under separate UK legislation. It is not affected by today’s EU General Court judgment.”

Regardless, the reaction from Israeli MKs and ministers was furious.

Economy Minister Naftali Bennett said that if anyone thinks that sacrificing Israel can save Europe, they are mistaken.

"The corrupt law of the EU court gives license for the shedding of Jewish blood everywhere and demonstrates the loss of a moral path," he said.

"Israel is strong and can defend itself from its enemies, but Europe itself will be the one to suffer from the strengthening of terrorist organizations," he added.

Bennett said that terror which receives a justification in Tel Aviv will quickly spread to London, Paris and Brussels.

Hatnua head Tzipi Livni called the court’s move a “grave mistake,” and said Hamas was an “extreme Islamic religious terrorist organization that must be fought with all force.”

Knesset Speaker Yuli Edelstein (Likud) said that the European Union "must have lost its mind." Edelstein said that the decision displays "inflexibility, moral distortion and grants a prize to the extremist Islamic terror that is currently plaguing the entire world, including Europe itself."

The Knesset speaker said that he hopes the "injustice" will be remedied quickly.

Labor MK Nachman Shai accused the court of hypocrisy, saying that "the body responsible for justice should know that Hamas does not deserve the benefit of the doubt, even for one minute.

"Terror is terror is terror. In the unending struggle against it, as has been brought to light recently in Australia and Pakistan,any concession is a sign of weakness. Europe must put Hamas back on the terror blacklist immediately," he said.

Likud MK Danny Danon said that "the Europeans must believe that there blood is more sacred than the blood of the Jews which they see as unimportant - that is the only way to explain the EU court's decision to remove Hamas from the terror blacklist," he said.

"In Europe they must have forgotten that Hamas kidnapped three boys and fired thousands of rockets last summer at Israeli citizens," he added.

Date:
Wednesday, December 17, 2014
Assets of group to remain frozen after ruling issued on technicality, but
Netanyahu says Jerusalem ‘not satisfied'; Hamas praises move
 
BY AFP AND TIMES OF ISRAEL STAFF December 17, 2014, 11:31 am Updated: December 17, 2014, 1:05 pm | The Times of Israel| 
 
The Palestinian Islamic group Hamas must be removed from the EU’s terrorism blacklist,
but its assets will stay frozen, a European court ruled on Wednesday.
The move, described by the European Union as a technicality, quickly drew Israeli condemnation
and praise from the Gaza­based organization.
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu called on the EU to return the group to the terror list, saying
Israel was “not satisfied with EU’s explanations that taking Hamas off the terror list is a ‘technical
matter.'”
 
“The burden of proof falls on the EU, and we expect it to permanently return Hamas to the list, so
everyone will understand that it is an inseparable part of it — Hamas is a murderous terror
organization that emphasizes in its charter that its goal is to destroy Israel,” he said in a statement.
The original listing in 2001 was based not on sound legal judgments but on conclusions derived
from the media and the Internet, the General Court of the European Union said Wednesday.
But it stressed that Wednesday’s decision to remove Hamas was based on technical grounds and
does “not imply any substantive assessment of the question of the classification of Hamas as a
terrorist group.”
 
The freeze on Hamas’s funds will also temporarily remain in place for three months pending any
appeal by the EU, the Luxembourg­based court said.
The General Court hears cases brought by individuals and member states against EU institutions.
“This legal ruling is clearly based on procedural grounds and it does not imply any assessment by
the Court of the substantive reasons for the designation of Hamas as a terrorist organisation,”
a spokesperson for the EU’s foreign policy chief Federica Mogherini said. “It is a legal ruling of a
court, not a political decision taken by the EU governments.”
 
The EU will continue to uphold the principles of the Middle East Quartet, which implies that it will
not engage with Hamas until the group renounces violence and recognizes Israel’s right to exist.
EU institutions are carefully studying the ruling will, “in due course, take appropriate remedial
action, including any eventual appeal to the ruling,” Mogherini’s spokesperson said. “In case of an
appeal the restrictive measures remain in place.”
 
In a meeting Wednesday morning with the Foreign Ministry, EU Ambassador to Israel Lars
Faaborg­Andersen said that EU intends to do everything it can to get Hamas back on the list.
The EU had asked Israeli officials not to cause a public row over the affair, according to Channel
10, and Jerusalem had kept quiet until Netanyahu’s statement Wednesday.
French­Jewish lawmaker Meyer Habib decried the decision and said the European Union failed to
combat the “modern cancer that is jihad.”
 
“We need to open our eyes! Yesterday the Taliban killed 120 children. IS, Hamas, Boko Haram,
Hezbollah, Taliban — each one is a separate branch on the same tree: a tree of hatred and terror.”
Hamas spokesman Fawzi Barhoum called the ruling a victory for the Palestinian nation and for its
rights. Barhoum’s counterpart Sami Abu Zuhri said it was a correction of a political mistake by the
EU.
Hamas’s military wing was added to the European Union’s first­ever terrorism blacklist drawn up
in December 2001 in the wake of the September 11 attacks on the United States.
The EU blacklisted the political wing of Hamas in 2003.
“The General Court finds that the contested measures are based not on acts examined and
confirmed in decisions of competent authorities but on factual imputations derived from the press
and the Internet,” the court said.
Instead, such an action had to be based on facts previously established by competent authorities,
it said.
 
The lawyer for Hamas, Liliane Glock, told AFP she was “satisfied with the decision.”
The move stemmed from a petition recently submitted to the European Court of Human Rights on
a related matter concerning Tamil terrorists.
During those proceedings, it was argued that the EU had designated Hamas a terror group on the
basis of information provided by the United States, while EU regulations require that the EU’s own
material be used as the basis for such a designation, Israel’s Channel 10 news reported Tuesday.
 
Based on this, the EU would temporarily remove Hamas from its list of designated terror groups,
but swiftly return it to that list once the correct paperwork has been processed.
Channel 10 said that the EU has kept Israel informed about the process, and that there have been
contacts with top Israeli officials, including Netanyahu and Foreign Minister Avigdor Liberman.
Israel had raised concerns that Hamas could exploit any time lag to operate in Europe, the TV
report said. The EU has promised Israel, however, that it will seek to block that possibility,
including by issuing interim regulations.
Israel fought a 50­day war with Hamas­led fighters in the Gaza Strip over the summer

Pages