Archive for January 6th, 2009

Remembering Our Heroes (5/25/2007)

Tuesday, January 6th, 2009

I’d like you to meet U.S. Marine Corps Sergeant Jeremiah Workman. In 2004, Workman was serving as a squad leader at Camp Pendleton, California when he was deployed to Fallujah, Iraq. One day, while out on patrol, his team was ambushed, trapping many of his men in a building overrun by insurgents. Battling heavy enemy fire, Workman bravely laid down enough cover fire to allow many of the isolated Marines to escape. Workman then lead another group to provide cover fire for an attack into the building to rescue other trapped Marines, continuing to fire even after receiving several shrapnel wounds to his arms and legs and after a grenade exploded in front of him. After this second rescue attack, Workman again rallied his team for a final blitz in to clear the
building of insurgents and rescue the remaining Marines.

In all, Workma n’s leadership helped save 17 of the 20 Marines trapped inside the building, while eliminating 24 insurgents. For his extraordinary heroism, Jeremiah Workman received the Navy Cross (the Armed Forces’ second highest medal) and a Purple Heart.

It has become axiomatic that the media tend to filter out the good news, preferring the boosts in ratings and readership that accompany catastrophe and scandal. This is especially true with the war in Iraq, where criticisms of military misconduct at places like Abu Ghraib, Haditha and at Walter Reed Hospital in Washington, D.C. are presented
almost daily. But Iraq offers positive stories too — authentic acts of military heroism that go unreported by the media and, thus, unnoticed by most Americans.

Take Army Sergeant 1st Class Curtis Haines, who received the Medal of Bravery for diving into a burning vehicle to extract an Iraqi citizen seriously injured and on fire after a car bomb exploded at a military checkpoint. Haines pulled the civilian out of the raging fire and carried him 50 yards to safety before administering medical aid, saving
the man’s life.

Or take Marine Corporal Jason Dunham, who received the Medal of Honor (the Armed Forces highest award) posthumously in January. In a moving ceremony at the White House, President Bush recounted Dunham’s heroics, which included jumping on a grenade to save the lives of two of his men, using his helmet and body to absorb the blow that killed him.

There are literally thousands more stories of ordinary Americans performing extraordinary acts of selfless bravery on battlefields across the globe. While their stories are different, these soldiers share two things: a singular devotion to the idea that freedom must prevail and the courage to subordinate themselves to do wha t it takes to achieve that end.

Sadly, our military heroes have one more thing in common: anonymity. The mainstream media would have us believe we are engaged in a war without heroes. So far the only names the media trumpet are those whose actions speak to the alleged malfeasance of the American military, like Lynndie England and those involved in the boorishness at Abu Ghraib. But Workman, Haines and Dunham deserve to be held up as the heroes they are. While it is a sign of America’s goodness that we expose and denounce abuse by our troops - for while winning this war will not be easy, we guarantee our defeat by stooping to the level of our enemy - what does it say about our nation that we refuse to recognize those whohave performed genuine acts of heroism?

Despite the lack of positive media attention, the American Armed Forces continue to be highly regarded by the people they protect.&n bsp; A recent Gallup poll found 73% of respondents said they have a “great deal” or “quite a lot” of confidence in the military, surpassing by fifteen percent the next highest institutions, the police and organized religion. In contrast, public trust in television news and newspapers has reached an all-time low of 28 percent.

An April Pew poll similarly found favorable views of the military outnumbered negative ones by more than four to one (77 percent to 17 percent).

It’s a curious dynamic: Opinion polls simultaneously show tumbling public confidence in the war effort, scant trust of the mainstream media’s ability to report the news fairly and strong general approval of our military. Perhaps most tellingly, military recruiting remains strong, and applications to our military academies have even increased of late. West Point, for example, reported a 14 percent increase in applications last year.

Upon receiving the Navy Cross Medal, Sergeant Workman, with the humility characteristic of a Marine, told the Armed Forces Press Service, “The first thing I thought about was all the Marines we lost over there. I don’t look at myself as being any different. I did what any other Marine would have done. There are thousands of other Marines over there (in the Middle East) that deserve to be awarded, too.” Clearly, despite the consistent flow of bad news out of Iraq, and the paucity of good news, America is still able to produce young men and women who believe that freedom is always worth the sacrifice.

In his speeches, President Bush consistently links ultimate triumph in Iraq to one thing: American resolve. On Memorial Day, as America honors its heroes of yore, let us not forget our heroes of today, without whose courage and resolve victory would be impossible.

Hamas Will Never Change (2/3/2006)

Tuesday, January 6th, 2009

Diplomats in the United States and all over Europe are demanding that Hamas, winner of last week’s Palestinian elections, disarm and recognize Israel’s right to exist as the “price” for continued aid. President Bush said so in Tuesday’s State of the Union address: “…the leaders of Hamas must recognize Israel, disarm, reject terrorism, and work for lasting peace.”

But what if Hamas agrees to those conditions — does any sane person think they would mean it? Why should we give this murderous band of Islamofascists even one penny no matter what empty words they speak under pressure? From their founding until this very moment Hamas has consistently excelled at only one thing — killing Jews. (It’s charter states: “The solution of the problem (Israel) will only take place by holy war.”)

Predictably, Jimmy Carter and Bill Clinton don’t have a problem giving money to Hamas or negotiating with them. Carter says we could send the money to the United Nations, which then could pass it to Hamas, thus getting around our laws that prohibit subsidizing terrorist groups. Clinton had this to say: “One of the politically correct things in American politics…is we just don’t talk to some people that we don’t like, particularly if they ever killed anybody in a way that we hate.” Clinton thinks America is silly because we actually have moral qualms about negotiating with people who strap on bomb belts and blow up Israeli families having lunch.

Some liberals presume that because Hamas is now in a position of real political power — with the responsibility to govern — they will abandon their terrorist principles in order to maintain that power. (Of course, the Left thinks this way because the abandonment of principle in order to retain power is what they would do.)

Others assure us Hamas is only throwing “red meat” to its base and that when the reality of Israel’s existence sets in it will abandon any grandiose notions of “driving the Jews into the sea” and adopt a productive pragmatism, which will allow it to govern along side a Jewish state. But such assertions are unfounded. Although it was elected democratically, it will not govern that way. Hamas says it takes its orders not from its people or from any Constitution, but from the Koran — the same text Palestinians point to as justification for terrorist tactics against Jews.

Before we deceive ourselves about the Hamas agenda, let’s listen to their leader, Khaled Mashal, who, in the wake of the election victory, said this: “We will not agree to any kind of disregard of our right to Jerusalem.” (Notice he isn’t asking for half of Jerusalem.) “We are committed to the right of return.” The “right of return” is Palestinian-speak for the flooding of Israel with millions of Palestinians who have never lived one day in Israel to demographically swamp the Jewish nation. There are currently about 5 million Jews living in Israel. There are anywhere from 4 to 7 million Palestinian “refugees” who would return to Israel if given the chance. You do the math.

In order to get their hands on U.S. and European money, Hamas may say all sorts of things in the weeks ahead that diplomats will grab onto as evidence of “moderation.” It will soon make public a “peace initiative,” which, in part, offers Israel a 10-year renewable cease-fire. But senior Hamas leaders have also blatantly stated that olive branches will only be extended in order to gain international aid and buy time to gather resources and consolidate a powerbase, and that they will never give up on their ultimate goal of destroying Israel.

While Hamas may say some things that will have Western leaders wondering if the terrorist group isn’t “someone we can work with,” Hamas will never change — their goal is the destruction of Israel, their top ally is Iran; and, ultimately, they want to celebrate our destruction, too.