Pro-Israel News

Date:
Thursday, August 14, 2014
BY STOYAN ZAIMOV , CHRISTIAN POST REPORTER
August 14, 2014|7:25 am| The Christian Post|

 

A diverse group of evangelical leaders, led by the National Religious Broadcasters President & CEO Dr. Jerry A. Johnson, is set to travel this Sunday to Israel to show their support and friendship to the Jewish state and counter anti-semantic views.

"Countering rising anti-Semitism in the international press and on the streets, this friendship visit will communicate to Israel and to the Palestinians who stand in opposition to Hamas that we, leaders who represent the Christian community, stand with them. It will also show the world that Christians in general support the Jewish people and their right to security," Johnson said in a statement earlier this week.

"In addition, this visit should serve as an example to all followers of Jesus Christ, specifically encouraging them to pray for the peace of Jerusalem so that the lives of all those living in this region can be secure," he added. "We are thankful to the Israel Ministry of Tourism for coordinating this trip."

The "Christians in Solidarity with Israel" trip, scheduled for August 17-22, will include Christian leaders such as Richard Land, president of Southern Evangelical Seminary; Tony Perkins, president of Family Research Council; Anne Graham Lotz, president of AnGeL Ministries, and others.

"This trip will emphasize American Christians' steadfast support for Israel. It will also underscore our need to continue to pray for and work for the peace of Jerusalem so that all the people of that region, Jewish and Palestinian, can live without fear," Perkins explained in a statement.

"For a large number of Christians, there are two primary reasons to support Israel. We have the Jewish people to thank for our faith and we are instructed in Scripture not only to pray for the peace of Jerusalem, but are told that those who bless Israel will be blessed," he continued.

"Secondly, it is in the national security interest of the United States to support Israel. To abridge our commitment to the State of Israel would be an act of hostility not just to the Jewish state but would do damage to our own vital interests."

On Thursday, a new five-day ceasefire has been agreed to between Israel and militant group Hamas, BBC News reported.

The conflict has resulted so far in nearly 2,000 Palestinian deaths, the majority of which are said to be civilians. While Hamas has blamed Israeli aggression for the high death toll, Israel has said that militants are using civilians as human shields and hiding in residential areas in Gaza where they launch their rocket attacks on the Jewish state.

Israel has faced much criticisms for the high death toll during the conflict, including from the International Red Cross and Human Rights Watch, which have suggested in reports that Israel is committing war crimes in Gaza.

But the European Centre for Law and Justice came to its defense, arguing that it is Hamas that is committing war crimes.

"While insinuating that Israel is committing war crimes as it protects its civilian population under attack by Hamas terrorists, the Red Cross is turning a blind eye to the deadly terrorist tactics used by Hamas – using its own population as human shields – in clearly violation of international law. We are urging the Red Cross to rely on the facts and the truth in reporting what is taking place in the Gaza conflict," wrote Jay Sekulow, who serves as Chief Counsel of the ECLJ.

Also the U.N. Human Rights Council announced an inquiry into the Gaza conflict, but appointed a Canadian international lawyer, William Schabas, to head the inquiry. Israel has slammed the appointment of Schabas, asserting that the lawyer holds an anti-Israel bias that will unfairly influence the commission.

"This commission's anti-Israeli conclusions have already been written, all it needs is a signature," Israel foreign ministry spokesman Yigal Palmor has said.

"For this commission the important thing is not human rights but the rights of terrorist organizations like Hamas."

The full list of those who will participate in the Christians in Solidarity with Israel trip is available on the NRB website.

Date:
Tuesday, August 12, 2014

By Edwin Black, contributor

| The HIll |

Yet another tenuous cease-fire with Hamas is hanging on by a thread and may be broken by the time this is published. Through the plumes of smoke, Jerusalem now sees a very different political landscape. Virulent mass anti-Israel marches roil through the world's capitals — in some cases, with tens of thousands of angry protestors. War crime proceedings are now openly threatened by official bodies, even though they are based on confused conflations of international law uttered with the blindfold of Lady Justice pulled down over one eye only. The worldwide media establishment is now captive to its own inability to proffer balanced questions of Hamas's representatives even as Israeli spokesmen are continuously pressed for impossible answers. Even the White House has joined the chorus of those who find moral equivalency in the conflict, treating Hamas as though it were Lech Walesa's Polish Solidarity.

Israel is looking high and low for friends, especially those with a connection to Congress. It has found them — not just in its traditional reservoir of support in the American Jewish community, but also in Christians United for Israel (CUFI), which has now been propelled to the front row of pro-Israel organizations.

The opening salvo of wartime support was seen at the group's Washington Summit, held late last month on July 21. At the very moment when the Jewish state was under the first of a series of crushing waves of global criticism for its involvement in Operation Protective Edge, CUFI roused its American heartland membership in loud, rollicking support of Israel. That night, firebrand evangelist Pastor John Hagee led some 4,800 foot-stomping, shofar-blowing Christian delegates, who had traveled from across the nation and from overseas, to witness a procession of grand podium speeches backed up by floor-to-ceiling video effects, syncopated Israeli music and incisive info sessions. Part tent revival and part political shout, CUFI's Washington Summit is patterned after the mega-gatherings staged by the American Israel Public Affairs Committee in the very same hall. At a time when the fog and dust storms of war make it hard for some to discern the good guys from the bad guys, CUFI speakers brought clarity and context to its attendees.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu took time, via taped message, to thank the evangelical crowd for standing by Israel during its hourglass of need. He spoke from Israel, bunkered in a secure room. To thunderous applause, Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) exhorted the Israelis in their Gaza strategy to "go as far as you need to go, and do what you've got to do."

The Convention Center conclave was more than lip service. The next day, CUFI's membership swarmed the halls of Congress to lobby their representatives from the heartland to stop funding the Palestinian National Authority until it ceases paying terrorist salaries and to stand with Israel in its fight against Hamas.

Days later, CUFI spent a small fortune in a national, multi-platform advertising campaign, purchasing full-page ads "about the true nature of Hamas." Aimed at constituents in key districts, the full-page ads ran in volleys that appeared in The New York TimesThe Wall Street JournalThe Washington PostLos Angeles TimesUSA TodayThe Atlanta Journal-ConstitutionThe Denver PostChicago Sun-TimesThe Philadelphia InquirerThe Arizona RepublicThe Boston Globe, the Chicago Tribune, the Detroit Free Press, theHouston Chronicle, the Miami Herald, the New York Daily News, the New York Post, the San Francisco Chronicle, the Dallas Morning News and The Seattle Times. Display ads were also purchased at top news, analysis and Christian websites, including Fox News, the Christian Post, Beliefnet, the Blaze and the Drudge Report. Email blasts to the group's 1.8 million members backed up the ad campaign.

Those ads, in large type, quoted from the Hamas Charter, starting with the document's first syllables that vow destruction of the Jewish state: "Israel will exist and will continue to exist until Islam will obliterate it."

CUFI declared that its campaign was launched to eliminate the moral confusion in the American media when it comes to the true nature and goals of Hamas. A dedicated CUFI Web page asked readers to email Secretary of State John Kerry: "Now is not the time to ease the legal and justified blockade of Gaza. Now is the time to destroy Hamas' terror tunnels, remove Hamas' missile stockpiles, and demilitarize Gaza."

Before the newsprint was dry, CUFI organized a tour of 51 leading pastors — one from each state and the District of Columbia — to travel to Israel for a four-day solidarity trip. Braving hundreds of rockets, the pastors donated blood to the Israel Defense Forces and visited the wounded. CUFI executive director David Brog declared, "We will tell everyone we meet that those shouting 'death to the Jews' on the streets of Berlin and Paris do not represent all of us. And, perhaps most importantly, we'll share what we see and learn with our members back home."

Brog followed that declaration with an essay in The Times of Israel that articulated, "When we Americans fought Al Qaeda, we understood the moral distinctions between terrorists and a democracy seeking to defend itself from them. This moral clarity should not blur at ocean's edge. Israel is a democracy defending itself — and us — from the Palestinian equivalent of Al Qaeda, Hamas. We must stand unequivocally with Israel."

At a time when Jews in Europe are noiselessly changing their names, when Jews in America are questioning their identity and their safety in hushed tones, CUFI will not go quietly.

While some major American Jewish organizations are still typing press releases, pondering position statements and scheduling conference calls, CUFI has rushed in from the aisles to shake things up, joining StandWithUs and others in the front row of the pro-Israel community.

 

Date:
Monday, August 11, 2014

 August 11, 2014, 2:11 pm

|The Times of Israel|

72-hour ceasefire took hold in Gaza Monday, as Israeli and Palestinian negotiators headed to Cairo in search of a long-term solution to end over a month of deadly fighting.

The truce, which began just after midnight, was the fruit of days of Egyptian-brokered mediation to stem more than four weeks of violence.

Ten hours into the truce, the skies over Gaza remained calm, with no reports of violations on any side and signs of life emerging on the streets of the war-torn Palestinian enclave.

As the sun rose on Gaza City, shops and businesses began opening their doors and a handful of people could be seen doing their early shopping.

Outside a UN-run school, a clutch of cars and donkey carts waited to take some of the refugees back to homes they had fled during the fighting.

“We want to go back to see what happened to our house,” said Hikmat Atta, 58, who had piled his family into a small cart and was heading back to his home in the northern town of Beit Lahiya which they had left in the first days of the war.

But with the truce still in its early stages, he was not taking any chances.

“We’re just going back for the day, at night we’ll come back here,” he told AFP.

Egypt urged the warring sides to use the three-day lull to reach “a comprehensive and permanent ceasefire,” after efforts to extend a similar truce last week collapsed into a firestorm of violence, as Hamas fired a barrage of rockets at Israeli territory across the border.

UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon said it would give the two sides “another chance to agree on a durable ceasefire” while stressing the importance of addressing “the underlying grievances on both sides.”

Hamas, the de facto power in Gaza, has conditioned its agreement for any permanent agreement on Israeli lifting its eight-year blockade on Gaza.

“We insist on this goal,” Hamas’s exiled leader Khaled Mashaal told AFP in an exclusive interview in Doha on Sunday.

“In the case of Israeli procrastination or continued aggression, Hamas is ready with other Palestinian factions to resist on the ground and politically.”

Veteran Palestinian negotiator Saeb Erakat arrived in Cairo late Sunday for talks with Egyptian and Arab League officials on behalf of president Mahmoud Abbas, an airport official said.

Meanwhile, an Israeli team arrived in Cairo on Monday, an Israeli official told AFP.

The team was to resume Egyptian-mediated talks it had abandoned on Friday after Hamas refused to extend an earlier truce and resumed its fire on southern Israel.

Israel had pledged to send its negotiating team back when the truce took hold.

Palestinian delegates in Cairo said they would be happy for Abbas’s Palestinian Authority to take over the reconstruction of Gaza and execute any agreement reached in Cairo.

Israel has no direct interface with Hamas, whose charter calls for the destruction of the Jewish state.

“The national unity government and the Palestinian Authority will take over the execution of all that will be agreed upon during the truce talks,” Azzam al-Ahmed, head of the Palestinian delegation, told reporters.

“We are backing the setting up of a national body to be formed by president Abbas, which will take over the reconstruction (of Gaza),” said senior Hamas official Ezzat al-Rishq.

“The president of the body should be professional, credible and one who will be accepted internationally.”

The new truce deal followed a similar arrangement last week which had brought relief to millions on both sides of the border.

Hamas had refused to extend the 72-hour lull when it expired on Friday, and Israel accused the Islamist faction of breaching the agreement in its final hours with rocket attacks.

In the gap between ceasefires, warplanes hit more than 170 targets, killing at least 19 people, while the Palestinians fired at least 136 rockets at Israel, of which 93 hit and 13 were shot down, with the rest falling short inside Gaza, the army said.

According to Hamas Health Ministry figures, 1,939 Palestinians have been killed in the conflict. The UN says just under three-quarters of those killed in Gaza were civilians and around a third of the civilian victims were children. Israel says 750-1,000 of the dead are Hamas members and other gunmen. It also blames Hamas for all civilian fatalities, saying Hamas sets up rocket launchers and tunnel openings in Gaza neighborhoods and uses Gazans as “human shields.”

Israel has lost 64 soldiers and three civilians in the fighting. Eleven of the soldiers were killed by Hamas gunmen emerging from cross-border tunnels dug under the Israeli border.

Hamas has fired over 3,000 rockets at Israel, including some 600 from areas close to schools, mosques and other civilian facilities, the Israeli army said.

The resumption of fighting had put Netanyahu under increased pressure from hardliners to send ground troops back in to Gaza to topple Hamas.

 

Date:
Friday, August 8, 2014
BY REBECCA SHIMONI STOIL August 8, 2014, 4:00 pm
|The Times of Israel|
 
WASHINGTON — As a 72-hour truce came to an explosive end with rockets fired into
Israel Friday morning, it seemed as if the US had turned to other issues. In the days
and hours leading up to the Gaza ceasefire’s demise, the US appeared largely absent
at the crunch point in Cairo and, by Thursday night, it was the anxiously awaited humanitarian food
drop to some 30,000 starving Yazidis on an Iraqi mountaintop that topped the administration’s
foreign-policy talking points.
After weeks of blustering and blundering, with pronouncements from Washington podiums and
Secretary of State John Kerry’s lengthy attempt at securing a negotiated ceasefire through shuttle
diplomacy, Washington kept a low profile as delegations met in Egypt’s capital in the past few
days.
The US was, in fact, represented in Cairo. Acting Special Envoy for Israeli-Palestinian Negotiations
Frank Lowenstein — Martin Indyk’s successor — arrived in the Egyptian on Wednesday, August 6,
after talks began. His role was treated ambivalently, with State Department Deputy Spokeswoman
Marie Harf describing it as “to monitor progress and advise in areas where the US can be helpful
and achieve — in achieving a lasting ceasefire and forging a sustainable long-term solution for
Gaza,” but noting that “he will not be involved in direct mediation between the delegations.”
Harf suggested that the limited involvement stemmed from the fact that “obviously, Hamas is a
designated foreign terrorist organization” and that Washington does not maintain “direct contact
with Hamas officials.”
Kerry was nowhere to be seen — at least, not in the region. He was redirecting his focus on a
seven-day whirlwind tour to Kabul, Afghanistan, Naypyitaw, Burma; Sydney, Australia; Honiara,
Solomon Islands; and Honolulu, Hawaii.
The State Department emphasized that far from distant, “Secretary Kerry also continues to be
engaged with — at the leader level — with the key stakeholders.”
“Obviously, what we need to see is a longer-term ceasefire put in place, and if Frank can help and
our team there can help, if Secretary Kerry can help by making phone calls, we are absolutely
there to do so,” Harf said Thursday, in a barrage of ‘if’s. The takeaway message between the lines
was that Kerry was not currently engaged, but was willing to make phone calls if somebody
thought it would help. Yet nobody — at least publicly — was clamoring for a Kerry call, nor were
any such calls announced in the critical hours before Friday’s morning’s Hamas resumption of
rocket fire and the subsequent Israeli response.
The ceasefire — for better or for worse — appeared to be a regional show, run by Egypt. While
Egypt traditionally has served as a mediator in such conflicts, it did so in previous years with
strong, top-level US backing and involvement in talks.
Part of the challenge to US engagement is Washington’s own ambivalent relationship with the
Egyptian government.
Noting that there were aspects of Egyptian politics that the US found “objectionable,” the
Washington Institute for Near East Policy Executive Director Robert Satloff said, during a
Thursday panel on the Gaza ceasefire, that “if any strategic matter puts itself front and center and
requires a rethink of the need for high-level sympathetic engagement between the US and Egypt, it
is the events of the last few weeks.”
He said that senior members of the Obama administration are divided on their perspective on
Egypt and its potential role in the Middle East. “There are some who believe that Egypt is part of
the problem, and some who think it is part of the solution. And this difference of view stymies the
potential for a serious, strategic rethink and a serious, strategic reset of our relationship with
Cairo,” Satloff explained. “This is, to me, utterly regrettable, as underscored by the events of the
last couple of weeks.”
In this round of conflict, the US has nominally supported Egypt’s endeavors for weeks, even writing
off a United Nations attempt at brokering a deal with a statement that the US supports the
“Egyptian plan.” But the US has seemed reluctant to throw its weight around after the fallout from
Kerry’s Paris meetings with Qatari and Turkish representatives. Two weeks ago, Kerry submitted
a proposal based on Qatari and Turkish input, taking Hamas demands into account, which Israel’s
leaders flatly rejected and privately slammed. Kerry said later it was just a draft.
“The problem with the US proposal at the time, which raised a lot of consternation at the time not
just in Israel but in the PA and Egypt, was not that they wanted Turkey and Qatar to play a role, but
that they wanted to establish an alternative channel to the Egyptian role in this rather than direct
everything in that role,” explained Mike Herzog, a former IDF general, member of Israel’s peace
negotiations team and a fellow at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy during the
Thursday discussion on the Gaza ceasefire.
Ultimately, Herzog said, “the United States was less relevant in bringing about the solution than
Egypt and some regional actors, and that is very unfortunate.” As the US drew back from
involvement, Egypt appeared to lead a coalition of concerned Arab states — Saudi Arabia, Jordan,
and some Gulf states — who were invested in achieving a deescalation.
Egypt, with its control of the gate of the Rafah crossing, was the only state — other than Hamas’s
financial supporters, Qatar and Turkey — that seemed to be capable of generating leverage over
Hamas.
At the same time, Washington seemed to be losing some of its leverage. Aaron David Miller, a
senior fellow at the Woodrow Wilson Institute, suggested that US-Israeli tensions, which came to
a head following the Paris conference, had also served to limit Washington’s role in Cairo.
“The US at this point has little credibility with Israelis and no influence over Hamas,” Miller said,
explaining the low US profile during the talks.
Miller continued that an additional factor in Washington’s relative quiet in Cairo was the fact that
“there is a risk at this stage that a higher-profile role would complicate what it is that they’re trying
to achieve.”
Low levels of US involvement in this round of talks also meant, he added, that the US could
reassess its role should the ceasefire break down — as it did.
Speaking during the Washington Institute panel, Washington Institute Senior Fellow and former US
special envoy to the Middle East Dennis Ross suggested that the US — and perhaps other
western powers — could again take an active role toward a more lasting agreement after
successful ceasefire talks.
“One of the things we can count on, and it’s understandable, is that there is going to be a push
diplomatically to see what we can do with the Israeli-Palestinian conflict,” Ross suggested.
President Barack Obama’s comments Wednesday, in which he looked beyond the ceasefire
toward a more comprehensive resolution in Gaza, seemed to reinforce such a direction.
Ross went on to delineate possible steps that the US could take to create a more hospitable
climate through conflict management, if not resolution, in an environment of intense mutual
distrust between Israel and the Palestinian Authority, while still sidelining Hamas.
Ross’s colleague, Satloff, added that Washington’s relative sidelining in the ceasefire talks
emphasized the fact that “it would be really important for the US to turn a page from recent events,
to take on, to revisit the question of what are our priorities in this part of the world, what type of
leadership are we going to be projecting.”
The tendency for US behavior in the region as a whole, he warned, “is very reactive.”
“The comments of my colleagues point not toward a reactive posture, but the need for a very
active posture — one that is coordinated very well between the White House and the State
Department,” Satloff commented.
With the ceasefire lying in shambles, it has yet to be seen whether Washington’s low-profile
strategy will position the United States back in the center of any renewed attempts to deescalate,
or whether it missed a critical opportunity to take advantage of a brief window of respite to achieve
a lasting peace.
Date:
Thursday, August 7, 2014

 August 6, 2014, 10:04 pm Updated: August 6, 2014, 10:09 pm 

|The Times of Israel|

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Wednesday night set out a moral justification for the way the IDF has dealt with the Hamas strategy of firing rockets at Israel, and tunneling under the Israeli border, from the heart of Palestinian residential neighborhoods in Gaza.

Arguing that Israel’s battle over the past month against terrorists in Gaza using civilians as human shields came during a critical test period, he said it would be a “moral mistake” as well as a practical one to not take action against terrorists operating from mosques, schools and other civilian areas.

Such behavior would represent “an enormous victory for terrorists everywhere,” he said, and would result in more and more civilian deaths around the world.

“What’s happening now is not only a test for Israel but for the international community, for the civilized world itself, [for] how it is to defend itself,” Netanyahu declared at a press conference on the second day of a 72-hour ceasefire that began on Tuesday morning.

Terrorists must not be allowed to “fight from civilian areas with impunity” and rely on world condemnation of the victimized nation — in this case, Israel — for responding to attacks, he warned.

The prime minister blamed Hamas for Gaza’s civilian deaths, due to its rejection of various ceasefire proposals throughout the campaign and its deliberate basing of its military infrastructure in the heart of Gaza population centers.

Palestinian sources in Gaza say that over 1,800 people were killed in the past month during Operation Protective Edge; Israel says it killed some 900 combatants, and Netanyahu stressed that Israel “regrets” every civilian death. Israel entered the campaign in order to stem rocket fire from Gaza at Israeli towns and cities as well as to destroy a network of tunnels, dug by Hamas under the border, and used to launch attacks inside Israeli territory.

“Ninety percent of the fatalities could have been avoided had Hamas not rejected then the ceasefire it accepts now,” he said of an Egyptian ceasefire proposal that Israel accepted three weeks ago. “Hamas needs to be blamed for these deaths, ostracized from the family of nations.”

Israel’s response to the Hamas rocket and tunnel threat was “justified and proportionate” Netanyahu asserted, adding that “every civilian casualty is a tragedy — a tragedy of Hamas’s making.”

It would have been “disproportionate” not to act, he reasoned, and therefore “to get our people killed.”

Hamas fired over 3,000 rockets at Israel, including 600 from near to schools, mosques and homes, the Israeli army said Tuesday. Hamas gunmen also killed 11 IDF soldiers when emerging into Israel from its cross-border tunnels. Netanyahu said Wednesday that the Hamas “death squads” had planned much larger attacks on Israeli soldiers and civilians through the tunnels, and that demolishing them, as Israel has done in recent weeks, was a strategic necessity. In all, Israel lost 64 soldiers and three civilians in the campaign.

The prime minister presented evidence to back up his assertions of Hamas’s reliance on Gazans as human shields, showing footage of what he said were mortars fired from near an UNRWA elementary school for boys. He also described a “terror tunnel” near a school and many tunnels dug from inside homes.

“I think it’s very important for the truth to come out,” he said, devoting a section of his press conference to remarks in English, taking questions from foreign journalists, and saying Hamas had subjected foreign journalists to intimidation in Gaza in recent weeks.

He also screened footage from indian, Finnish and French TV of Hamas firing rockets from civilian areas, including the outskirts of Gaza City’s main hospital — footage that was only broadcast in the last few days.

Netanyahu offered condolences for the Palestinian citizens harmed or killed during the operation.

“Israel deeply regrets every civilian casualty, every single one. We do not target them. People of Gaza are not our enemies. Our enemy is Hamas,” the prime minister said.

The decision to pull forces out of Gaza last weekend was made only once the 30-plus sophisticated Hamas tunnels had been destroyed, he said. Netanyahu added that Israel was working “to create technological means to locate new tunnels that will reach into our territory.”

Netanyahu stressed the need to prevent Hamas from rearming. That, he said, is the way “to prevent this conflict from bring repeated.”

With regard to Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas’s role in negotiating a truce, Netanyahu said that the PA had played a part in talks and would continue to do so. Hamas seized control of Gaza from the PA in a violent takeover in 2007.

“We have cooperated and are cooperating with the PA,” he said. “We’re prepared to see a role for them [in] the reconstruction of Gaza, humanitarian aid, security questions. The ceasefire agreement was coordinated with them.”

Despite reports of bitter differences between Israel and the Obama administration throughout the war, Netanyahu thanked US Secretary of State John Kerry for his support, saying he had another “very good” conversation with Kerry on Wednesday afternoon. He welcomed Kerry’s calls for the disarmament of Gaza-based terror groups.

He also praised the “iron discipline” of Israelis — a play on the “Iron Dome” which intercepted hundreds of the Hamas rockets — and lauded the Israel Defense Forces.

“The IDF is an amazing army,” he said. “It’s a strong army [and] had major achievements. It stood and stands by all the requirements. The entire nation is behind the IDF, during peace and during war.

“I am proud of the IDF. I am proud to be the prime minister of such a united people.”

Date:
Wednesday, August 6, 2014
BY AFP AND TIMES OF ISRAEL STAFF August 6, 2014, 12:44 pm
|The Times of Israel|
 
fragile ceasefire in the Gaza Strip entered a second day Wednesday as Israeli and
Palestinian delegations prepared for talks in Cairo to try to extend the 72-hour truce.
Delegations are now ready for what are expected to be tough talks aimed at securing a permanent
ceasefire after the three-day window closes. The United States is also due to take part in the talks,
though Secretary of State John Kerry is not expected to attend, according to Israeli media reports.
Officials on both sides confirmed sending small teams to Cairo.
Citing Egyptian officials, the Haaretz daily reported overnight Tuesday that Shin Bet chief Yoram
Cohen was part of Israel’s delegation to Cairo for ceasefire talks with Palestinians. Earlier, Israeli
media reported that Yitzhak Molcho, a trusted associate of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu,
and Amos Gilad, a high-ranking defense official, were heading the Israeli delegation.
Molcho, Netanyahu’s close aide, was a member of Israel’s negotiation team during recent failed
peace talks with the Palestinian Authority.
Gilad is the director of policy and political-military affairs at the Defense Ministry. Both have been in
Cairo for previous ceasefire discussions.
The delegation arrived in Cairo Tuesday evening.
It will not be holding direct negotiations with the Palestinian party — which includes members of
Hamas, Fatah, Islamic Jihad and others — but will be transferring messages back and forth
through Egyptian mediators.
Both sides bring conflicting demands and face an uphill diplomatic battle.
The Palestinians insist that Israel end its eight-year blockade of Gaza and open border crossings,
while Israel wants Gaza fully demilitarized after having suffered from years of rocket and mortar
Relief mixed with skepticism
fire from the Strip and having more recently uncovered a network of tunnels, some of which led
under the border to Israel and were used by Hamas fighters to kill 11 Israeli soldiers in several
attacks. Israel’s Army Radio reported that Cairo is pushing for a plan that would put the Palestinian
Authority in charge of rehabilitating the Gaza Strip, Army Radio reports.
The unsourced report noted that Israel is likely to accept the plan, which would also put the PA,
headed by Fatah leader Mahmoud Abbas, in charge of the Palestinian side of the Rafah border
crossing between Egypt and Gaza.
The move would serve to somewhat sideline Hamas, which has been governing the Strip since a
violent takeover from the Palestinian Authority in 2007.
The ceasefire, which came into effect Tuesday, has brought relief to both sides after a month of
fighting. Israel launched its operation on July 8 to stem rocket fire from Gaza onto Israeli towns,
and later expanded the campaign to a ground incursion in a bid to destroy the attack
tunnel network.
After the longest period of quiet since fighting began, Palestinian authority foreign minister Riyad
al-Maliki said he expected “the ceasefire to expand into another 72 hours and beyond.”
“We are determining at what level and in what capacity and when,” State Department
spokeswoman Jen Psaki told reporters in Washington.
Kerry, in a BBC interview, called for a sustained ceasefire but stressed that the crucial wider
issues will need to be addressed.
“How are we going to make peace? How are we going to eliminate these rockets? How are we
going to demilitarize and move towards a different future?” he asked.
On the first day of the truce in Gaza City, people came out in numbers, children played on the
street and some shops reopened for the first time in days.
Others ventured home only to find utter devastation.
“What am I going to tell my wife and children? I don’t want them to see this! They will go crazy,”
said Khayri Hasan al-Masri, a father of three who returned to his heavily damaged home in Beit
Hanoun in the north after fleeing when Israel’s ground offensive began on July 17.
Israel’s security cabinet met to discuss a long-term ceasefire, but broke up without any public
statement. In southern Israel, there was relief but skepticism.
“I never trust Hamas,” said Orly Doron, a mother living in a Gaza border kibbutz that has been
battered by rocket fire.
“We had three or four ceasefires during this war; we all saw they weren’t kept.”
A poll published by Haaretz Wednesday said a majority of Israelis thought “nobody” had won the
conflict in Gaza.
Asked “Following the ceasefire, how would you describe the results of Operation Protective
Edge?” 51 percent of those who took part said neither side had won. Another 36 percent said they
thought Israel had won, and just six percent thought Hamas had emerged victorious.
It is the second time in four days the two sides had agreed to observe a 72-hour humanitarian
truce. The previous attempt on August 1 — brokered by Washington and the UN — was shattered
by Hamas after just 90 minutes.
The new ceasefire, announced by Egypt late on Monday, is the longest lull since fighting began.
This time Israel has withdrawn its troops, ending the ground operation aimed at destroying
Hamas’s tunnels.
Army spokesman Lieutenant Colonel Peter Lerner said troops would respond to any truce
violations.
Israeli Brigadier General Guy Goldstein, deputy head of the unit responsible for civilian affairs in the
Palestinian territories, said more than 250 trucks of supplies entered Gaza on Tuesday.
The United States and the United Nations have welcomed the truce, saying the onus was on
Hamas to keep its part of the deal.
 
Date:
Tuesday, August 5, 2014

 August 5, 2014, 3:06 pm
|The Times of Israel|

What began on June 12 at the junction outside Alon Shvut, in the Etzion bloc of the West Bank, with the kidnapping and killing of three Israeli teenagers, may have concluded at the nearby settlement of Alon Shvut, where the last rocket fired by Hamas from Gaza — minutes before the ceasefire came into force on Tuesday morning — hit the earth.

One long line connects that abduction-murder with the descent into conflict that Hamas deliberately instigated against Israel from Gaza. The Islamist organization wanted to escalate the situation against Israel, and to a certain extent, against the Palestinian Authority, in order to boost its standing among the Palestinian and wider Arab public and to ensure the economic survival of its rule in Gaza. It is of course too early to determine whether the current ceasefire will prove longer-lasting than its predecessors. Predictably, in the last few minutes before 8 a.m., Hamas launched rocket salvos in numerous directions. One rocket landed in the Palestinian city of Beit Sahour, near Bethlehem. Apparently nothing had changed.

Nonetheless, the announcement of a ceasefire by the Middle East’s responsible adult, Egypt — this time in consultation with Hamas and Islamic Jihad, rather than unilaterally — may indicate a greater likelihood of success. The Egyptians this time did one thing differently from three weeks ago, when their ceasefire proposal was rejected by Hamas — they brought Hamas representatives to Cairo, and gave the rulers of Gaza the sense that Cairo was speaking to them rather than spitting in their faces. Furthermore, the fact that all Palestinian factions accepted the Egyptian framework, and abandoned the Qatar-Turkey channel, marks a significant victory for Egypt in the struggle for regional primacy, and to some extent makes it more difficult for Hamas to evade ending the conflict.

The critical question for Hamas surrounds what it will manage to achieve in the indirect negotiations now getting underway in Cairo between the Israeli delegation and the Palestinian delegation (with its Hamas and Islamic Jihad representatives). The very fact that Hamas accepted the Egyptian umbrella and the Cairo formula — providing for an immediate cessation of hostilities, and negotiations only after that — marked a humiliating defeat of sorts. For almost three weeks Hamas had insistently rejected the proposal for an unconditional ceasefire with its demands to be addressed only afterwards. But on Monday night, it changed course.

That shift signals the difficult position in which Hamas now finds itself. It still has plenty of rockets, and its leadership is unharmed. But its military infrastructure is severely damaged. And worse, the civilian infrastructure of Gaza is devastated. Thousands of homes have been completely destroyed, and tens of thousands partly destroyed. There are over 1,800 people dead — Israel says hundreds of them are Hamas fighters — and more than 9,500 injured. If, after all that, the negotiations in Egypt end without Hamas managing a significant achievement related to the lifting of the blockade, it would be a grave blow to the organization’s standing in Palestinian public opinion.

Another aspect that will determine Hamas’s status concerns its capacity to rehabilitate the Gaza Strip. The fact is, however, that no Palestinian hierarchy — neither the PA nor Hamas — could likely manage this project. The damage done to Gaza stands in the billions of dollars, and Hamas certainly cannot fix it alone. The PA has already initiated an international gathering to deal with rehabilitation. The PA government — the joint Fatah-Hamas-backed government with which Israel refused to cooperate — is promising to try to renew electricity and water supplies. But the rebuilding process will take years. The thousands upon thousands of residents of Shejaiya, Beit Hanoun and other areas, who will have to live in tents in the interim, are unlikely to step up their support for Hamas, or for the PA, without new housing.

Unless there is dramatic and immediate rebuilding and rehabilitation of Gaza, indeed, those who profit most from the widespread devastation are unfortunately likely to be organizations still more extreme. Already active active in Gaza, these groups will find fertile ground to recruit. Small groups and factions affiliated with al-Qaeda, which make Hamas look like a Boy Scout movement, are also likely to try to renew their fire on Israel in the next few days, mainly in order to embarrass Hamas.

Which raises the question of what Israel would then do. Will it renew its campaign in Gaza, or return to the old policy after Operation Pillar of Defense in 2012, which regarded Hamas’s control of the Strip as a security interest and protective force for the State of Israel?

Date:
Monday, August 4, 2014
By BURGESS EVERETT | 8/1/14 12:12 PM EDT Updated: 8/3/14 12:33 PM EDT
|POLITICO|

Congress signed off on $225 million in aid for Israel before beginning a long congressional recess.

The Senate approved the money for Israel’s Iron Dome missile defense system on Friday morning, hours after an ugly floor spat nearly left the U.S. ally without additional aid. The House approved the funding Friday night in a 395-8 vote.

Fiscally conservative Sen. Tom Coburn (R-Okla.) on Thursday night blocked the emergency cash infusion for the Iron Dome, which intercepts rockets fired at Israel by Hamas, over concerns that the spending was not offset and would increase the deficit. But Coburn represented only a narrow minority of GOP senators who wanted to see the funding offset, and his objections were opposed by nearly the entire rest of the Senate.

By Friday morning, when the Senate opened up for its last session until September, Coburn had relented. The Senate unanimously approved the Israeli aid, a rare moment of bipartisan agreement after a nasty Thursday derailed attempts to aid Israel, provide new funding for the migrant influx at the southern border and confirm a raft of nominees to global hotspots.

“This is a good example of us being able to put aside partisan considerations and work together to help our good friend, Israel,” said Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), who first proposed splitting off the Israeli aid from a failed larger package that also included money for the border and to fight wildfires.

“I will stand by Israel for a lot of personal reasons but certainly for political reasons. And I have no hesitation in declaring to the world that’s how I feel,” said Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.), who called the retiring Coburn a “fine man” despite the floor snafu on Thursday. Reid said he refused to point fingers at the Oklahoma Republican, despite their often contentious relationship.

In a statement, Coburn on Friday replied that “it is unfortunate, yet typical, the Senate majority blocked an amendment to pay for the costs of protecting Israel by reducing unnecessary contributions to the U.N.”

Reid, McConnell and Sens. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) and John McCain (R-Ariz.) all shook hands after the Iron Dome money finally passed — an uncommon kumbaya moment in a bitterly divided Capitol.

“As dysfunctional as the Congress has been, this is one of our finer moments. We’re about to leave here soon with a lot of work undone. “But let it be said” that “we did have the foresight and the ability — and quite frankly the moral decency — to end on a positive note,” Graham said.

 

Date:
Friday, August 1, 2014

 | Politico Magazine| 

It’s difficult to imagine the terror that the people of Israel must live with every day. For Israelis, at any given moment a missile might be detected, rocketing toward a residential neighborhood; a bomber might detonate him or herself in a crowded public place; and terrorists sent by Hamas might infiltrate their borders through secret tunnels to kidnap or kill their children.

Thousands of miles away, it might be convenient to criticize Israel for having the temerity to defend itself against these murderous terrorist attacks.

Those of us who have been to Israel and have seen the effects of these attacks first-hand have a deeper understanding of what the Israeli people are being forced to endure.

 

On my own visits to Israel, I’ve visited with families who were afraid to let their children play outside, and seen the fortified playgrounds where they can go. I’ve seen the rubble of structures brought down by missile strikes and looked in the eyes of people who live with the threat of violence day-in and day-out.

The conflict between Hamas and Israel is merely one part of a much-larger conflict, one with far-ranging implications that can affect the lives of every person on the globe.

To begin, anyone tempted to suggest Israel has used a disproportionate amount of force to defend itself needs to remember the origins of this latest round of violence. It’s Hamas that continued to launch rockets, despite Israel’s willingness to discuss and abide by multiple cease-fires. It’s Hamas that uses Palestinians as human shields to protect its leaders and its arsenals, and to preserve its extensive system of tunnels. And it’s Hamas that would, if given the opportunity, take the life of every Israeli within range of its thousands of rockets.

Israel needs more than our passive support—it needs our vigorous support. The overwhelming success of the Iron Dome defense system has been the only thing to prevent the deaths of thousands of Israelis, and changes nothing in Hamas’ deadly intent. And under the circumstances, Israel’s response has been anything but disproportionate. In fact, Israel has taken extraordinary – even unprecedented – measures to protect as many lives as possible in its efforts to disarm and disable Hamas.

The United States must take the lead in bringing the international community together to demand the total removal of every missile in Gaza, as well as the complete destruction of the tunnel network being used by Hamas terrorists. To facilitate this, the United States must use the tools available to us diplomatically and continue to support the actions of the Israel Defense Forces. Should the international community fail to join us in sufficient numbers, the United States should block actions in the United Nations aimed at preventing Israel from defending itself.

 

Not only is this the right thing to do, it’s also imperative we send the message to Hamas, Hezbollah and other terrorist organizations that the free world will not tolerate their lawless behavior and that aggression toward Israel and its allies can only lead to negative consequences.

That’s why it was disheartening last weekend to see the United States moving closer to Turkey and Qatar than to our traditional allies, pressing the Israelis for an immediate cease-fire instead of allowing them to finish the job.

There’s no doubt that America’s reaction to the Israeli-Gaza conflict is being watched and gauged by nations like Iran, and our failure to stand firmly beside our ally will only embolden the Islamic Republic to continue its criminal efforts to develop and build a nuclear device.

 

Any equivocation or perceived weakness on our part will be noticed immediately not just in Tehran, but in Moscow and Beijing as well. It can only help usher in a new nuclear arms race, one that holds the potential of becoming infinitely more frightening than the one the free world endured decades ago. Hamas, Hezbollah and other terrorist groups have demonstrated time and again that they have no regard for human life – Israeli, Palestinian or American. The possibility of individuals like that gaining access to a nuclear weapon is something we simply cannot allow.

These are the very real stakes of the conflict in Israel. While we pray that the latest cease-fire agreement holds, we need to accept that true, lasting peace can only happen with the elimination of all missiles in Gaza, the destruction of all tunnels between Gaza and Israel and the disarmament of terrorist groups.

Anything short of that will just delay the next round of conflict and encourage our enemies. Only through our resolve, and our continued dedication to the freedom and safety of the Israeli people, can we ensure that our own safety, and that of free peoples around the world, will be protected.


 

 

Date:
Wednesday, July 30, 2014

The United Nations Relief & Works Agency For Palestine Refugees (UNRWA) announced Tuesday that another rocket stockpile has been found at one of its schools in Gaza. This instance marks the third time since the beginning of Operation Protective Edge that a weapons arsenal has been found at an UNRWA school in Gaza.

UNRWA has yet to place blame on any individuals or organizations for placing the weapons stockpile within a children’s school. The UN body refused to do so on the past two previous occasions as well.

The UN body, after both previous findings, has handed the rockets it had found back into the possession of “the local police," otherwise known as the terrorist group Hamas.

This week, UNRWA supplies and building materials had been found in Hamas’s tunnel infrastructure, which has been used to smuggle weapons and carry out attacks on the State of Israel.

The UN agency has a well-documented history of using their US taxpayer-funded facilities to promote anti-Israel and anti-Semitic propaganda. It has in the past been accused of aiding and abetting radical Islamists in Gaza and elsewhere.

UNRWA was created in 1949 to provide relief and public works programs for displaced Arab refugees that had formerly inhabited the British mandate of Palestine. UNRWA is currently the largest agency-subdivision of the entire UN, employing over 30,000 staff. UNRWA has objectively failed in its primary goal of finding homes for those it has deemed “refugees”. From 1949 to present day, refugees recognized by UNRWA has grown from 750,000 to 5,000,000 people.

Pages